TG-1 Transgallaxys Forum 1

Canadian insane paved the way. Now British vultures are harvesting the seed of evil.

http://www.wddty.com/homeopathic-flu-vaccines-are-effective-says-health-regulator.html

[Quote F]
Home » News
Homeopathic flu vaccines are effective, says health regulator

22 May 2013
Ten homeopathic flu vaccines have been licensed for use by Canada’s health regulator.  They join a growing list of homeopathic vaccines available to Canadians, including ones to prevent polio, measles and pertussis (whooping cough).  All of the vaccines have passed tests that deem them to be “safe and effective when used according to instructions on the label.”
The latest licences have been granted to a range of homeopathic flu vaccines called Influenzinum, which have been manufactured by various companies, including BJ Pharmaceutical, Boiron and Homeocan....

You’re a click away from some of the best health information on the Web

If you are already a member please login

We ask everyone to join the WDDTY site first. It’s free to see the News and Community items – but you might want to consider our other options, too.
Continue
Related WDDTY Content
Increase in unreported whooping cough

The pertussis (whooping cough) vaccine may not prevent transmission of the disease and infants aged 0-2 months are most at risk. ...
Mutating Whooping cough may not respond to new vaccines

In October 2001, the government added a new ‘safer’ vaccine to its booster schedule, with no real safety testing. But new evidence shows that whooping...
Whooping cough on the increase

Whooping cough pertussis is on the increase in the US despite a programme of compulsory vaccination. ...
Dpt jabs fail to stop whooping cough

A Finnish study found that in a population with a 98 per cent immunisation rate, whooping cough infections remain common. ...
Alternative ways to prevent or treat whooping cough

There’s no doubt that whooping cough is distressing disease, for both child and parent. However, there are many ways to prevent and treat the illness.
Case study:Whooping Cough or Viral Asthma?

We have four children, none of whom have been vaccinated. Some five weeks ago, they all suffered cold and cough symptoms, which, in the case of two,...
What our readers and members say about WDDTY "

Keep up the good work. WDDTY is an invaluable source of up-to-date information which would be difficult for anyone not in the medical field to access any other way.
" - S W-S, London Biomedical Clinics Ltd

© 2010 WDDTY Publishing Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
[/Quote F]


Do Health Canada really state "Homeopathic flu vaccines are effective"? Yes, they do! One of the sources linked in the British Columbia Medical Journal article is with Health Canada. It is list item #13.

"13.    Health Canada. Drugs and Health Products. About Natural Health Products. How do I know if a product has been authorized?
Accessed 20 March 2013."
http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/dhp-mps/prodnatur/about-apropos/cons-eng.php#a4.

[Quote G]
Health Canada
www.hc-sc.gc.ca

Home > Drugs & Health Products > Natural Health Products > About Natural Health Product Regulation in Canada

About Natural Health Products

Using natural health products can be a good way to maintain or improve your health. But just because a product is “natural” doesn’t mean it is safe for you to use.

This section will tell you more about:
What natural health products are
The risks of using natural health products
How to use natural health products safely
How to find authorized products
How to report unwanted side effects
What Health Canada does to protect you
Where to get more information
What are natural health products?

Natural health products (NHPs) are naturally occurring substances that are used to restore or maintain good health. They are often made from plants, but can also be made from animals, microorganisms and marine sources. They come in a wide variety of forms like tablets, capsules, tinctures, solutions, creams, ointments and drops.

Natural health products, often called "complementary" or "alternative" medicines, include:
vitamins and minerals
herbal remedies
homeopathic medicines
traditional medicines like traditional Chinese and Ayurvedic (East Indian) medicines
probiotics
other products like amino acids and essential fatty acids

Many everyday consumer products, like certain toothpastes, antiperspirants, shampoos, facial products and mouthwashes are also classified as natural health products in Canada.

Fast fact: 71% of Canadians have used natural health products like vitamins and minerals, herbal products, and homeopathic medicines.

NHPs are used and marketed for a number of health reasons, like the prevention or treatment of an illness or condition, the reduction of health risks, or the maintenance of good health. They must be safe to be used as over-the-counter products. Products needing a prescription are regulated as drugs.

Are there risks to using natural health products?

While natural health products are generally safe and have fewer side effects than medications, they are not risk free. Risks include:
manufacturing problems (like contamination, incorrect ingredients or dosage)
unproven claims, which can lead people to use the wrong products for serious conditions or to delay proper treatment
not enough information for people to make an informed choice (like incorrect instructions or no warnings that a product may not be suitable for certain groups)
interaction with prescription drugs or other natural health products
unwanted side effects, like allergic reactions


Fast fact: 12% of Canadians who use natural health products report that they have experienced unwanted side effects (adverse reactions).

Health Canada responded to Canadians' concerns about these risks by creating the Natural Health Products Regulations in 2004. See What is Health Canada doing to protect me? for more.

How can I use natural health products safely?

Take these steps to minimize your risk:
Talk to a health care professional like a doctor, pharmacist or naturopath before choosing a product. This is especially important for children, pregnant or breast-feeding women, seniors, and people with serious medical conditions.
To prevent interactions, make sure your health care provider knows what other drugs and natural health products you are using.
Use approved products. Look for NPN / DIN-HM numbers that identify licensed products.
Be skeptical of health-related claims that seem too good to be true. Don’t rely on ads: do your own research and talk to your health care provider.
Read and follow all instructions on the product label.
Report unwanted side effects (adverse reactions) to your health care provider and Health Canada.

How do I know if a product has been authorized?

To be licensed in Canada, natural health products must be safe, effective, of high quality and carry detailed label information to let people make safe and informed choices.

You can identify products that have been licensed for sale in Canada by looking for the eight-digit Natural Product Number (NPN) or Homeopathic Medicine Number (DIN-HM) on the label.

A NPN or DIN-HM means that the product has been authorized for sale in Canada and is safe and effective when used according the instructions on the label.
 
You can search for licensed natural health products using Health Canada’s Licensed Natural Health Products Database.

Because Health Canada has not yet evaluated all natural health products currently on the market, products with exemption numbers can also legally be sold in Canada. The exemption number will be listed on the product label in the form EN-XXXXXX.

These products have not been fully evaluated by Health Canada, but have gone through an initial assessment to make sure that information supporting their safety, quality and efficacy has been provided, and that specific safety criteria have been met. This will allow Canadians access to the full range of NHPs they are used to while Health Canada continues to fully assess each product.

You can search for exempted natural health products using Health Canada’s Exempted Products Database.
How do I report unwanted side effects?

You should report unwanted side effects (adverse reactions) to your health care provider and to Health Canada. To report a side effect now, see Adverse Reaction Reporting.

Reporting side effects is important because it helps Health Canada identify rare or serious adverse reactions, make changes in product safety information, issue public warnings and advisories, and/or remove unsafe products from the Canadian market.

Fast fact: Only 41% of Canadians who experienced unwanted side effects (adverse reactions) to natural health products reported them.

What is Health Canada doing to protect me?

Health Canada assures that all Canadians have ready access to a wide range of natural health products that are safe, effective and of high quality.

We assess all natural health products before letting them be sold in Canada. We also assure they are properly manufactured (without contamination or incorrect ingredients). And we do post-market monitoring to make sure that NHP Regulations are being followed.

For more information, please see About Natural Health Product Regulation in Canada.

Where can I learn more?
Related advisories, warnings and recalls

For the most recent advisories, warnings and recalls about NHPs and other health products, see Advisories, Warnings and Recalls.
More about natural health products
About Natural Health Product Regulation in Canada +/-
Safe Use of Natural Health Products +/-
The Safe Use of Natural Health Products During Menopause +/-
The Safe Use of Health Products for Weight Loss +/-
Informing You about Natural Health Products +/-
Exempted Products +/-
Frequently Asked Questions +/-
Licensed Natural Health Products Database +/-
Exempted Products Database +/-
Natural Health Products Ingredients Database +/-
Additional resources
Report a Side Effect (Adverse Reaction)
Contact the Natural Health Products Directorate
Stay Connected
Consumer Safety Portal
Legislation and Guidelines
For Industry and Professionals
Share

Important Notices on Hyperlinking and the Official Languages Act.

Stay Connected with Health Canada's Social Media Tools! The Government of Canada does not endorse any particular social media site or tool.
Date Modified: 2012-06-20
[/Quote G]


They dare to have "Important Notices on Hyperlinking and the Official Languages Act. Yes, they really dare. Shouldn't they first be concerned about the veracity of their statements?

Aside of much blah-blah Health Canada makes 3 substantial statements:

No. 1
"Using natural health products can be a good way to maintain or improve your health."

No. 2
"Fast fact: 71% of Canadians have used natural health products like vitamins and minerals, herbal products, and homeopathic medicines."

No. 3
"To be licensed in Canada, natural health products must be safe, effective, of high quality..."

Concentrated in these 3 statements Health Canada give a clear line to follow: "natural health products" are good, "3/4 of the Canadians use them", and "the products licensed by Health Canada are safe and effective".

This, exactly this, is what Mister John Average will read. But it is not true. Even a simpleton will realize: homeopathy is not a natural health product. Incredible, but either Health Canada is too uneducated to know this, or Health Canada lies. There are only these two choices, each of which is devastating. But that is a mere nothing compared with THE STATEMENT on licensed products being effective. How did Health Canada decide homeopathic vaccines to be effective? Who in Health Canada made that decision? Who in Health Canada is backing up that decision? How many persons in which function are involved in this scam?

Health Canada is a Federal department:

http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ahc-asc/index-eng.php

[Quote H]
Health Canada is the Federal department responsible for helping Canadians maintain and improve their health, while respecting individual choices and circumstances.
[/Quote H]

How can a Canadian Federal department make so horrendously false statements on the efficacy of medicaments? This is fraud at the highest level, not only affecting Canadian citizens but also people in other continents. How was this done? Bribery? Blackmail? Hypnosis? How can a Federal department as such be made a tool for an international health fraud? How many million Dollars were required?

It needs more than one person for this. One person can be bought, insane, or both. But a whole Federal department? There the probability of insanity goes down to zero, unless one assumes mass hypnosis. No, with rising numbers of persons involved, the probability for a criminal cause, be it corruption or other means, is banging up to 100 percent.

Who did it!?

The TGA ordered Mery Dorey to retract her advertising and claims concerning the black salve. In February of this year we have this article on this matter:

[*quote*]
Former AVN president forced to retract advertising on black salve

15th Feb 2013
Andrew Bracey

A TGA complaints resolution panel has ordered former Australian Vaccination Network president Meryl Dorey to retract advertisements for black salve on the grounds claims regarding the product were misleading.

The finding follows a complaint concerning audio material published at the website www.fairdinkumradio.com that appeared in the context of an interview between Ms Dorey and Leon Pittard which the panel found constituted an advertisement.

In an excerpt from the interview included in the panel’s decision, Ms Dorey said “one of the DVDs that we sell is by Elaine Hollingsworth and it's called One Answer to Cancer. Now Elaine runs a health retreat up on the Gold Coast called Hippocrates Health, and she was almost killed by a mainstream cancer treatment called... Altara (sic), I could have the name wrong. It’s been banned in many countries and she had skin cancer, was given this treatment, and it almost killed her. And as a result of that experience she found a treatment that's been used for at least two thousand years, called black salve”.

Ms Dorey went on to describe black salve as “a combination of herbs and minerals that is applied topically to cancer and it's called ‘Nature's Scalpel’”.

“Now, I've used it myself on a cancer that I had on my shoulder and I've gotta tell you it is like a scalpel. It cut it out in a perfect circle and it got rid of it completely.”

In March last year the TGA issued a warning against the use of red or black salves in the treatment of skin disorders after it was notified of three cases where consumers had caused serious harm to their skin by using the salves.
[...]
[*/quote*]

read more: http://www.medicalobserver.com.au/news/former-avn-president-forced-to-retract-advertising-on-black-salve

How long ago did this happen? The article was published in mid February. That is two months ago. One month ago, that is one month after the article, Meryl Dorey wrote these statements in public:

[*quote*]
Meryl Dorey commented on the petition
 · about 1 month ago
Australian Government: Decriminalise the use of Cansema/Black Salve on human beings

I have personally used black salve and it worked perfectly! I have been cited by the Therapeutic Goods Administration three times now for daring to say this and for selling Elaine Hollingsworth's One Answer to Cancer information DVD. As a citizen of Australia, I have the right to care for my own health in my own way and to discuss this with others. I oppose the tyranny of the TGA.
[*/quote*]

(source: http://www.change.org/en-AU/users/8993331)

Meryl Dorey insists: "I have the right to care for my own health in my own way and to discuss this with others."

If  Meryl Dorey decides to do it, she can shoot herself. No objection to that, honestly. But she must not advertise for a potentially lethal fraud. And for sure she must neither sell nor distribute for free DVDs that have a high influence on desperate persons deadly ill with cancer. Didn't Meryl Dorey accuse the parents of deceased pertussis victim Dana McCaffery of being bought by "big pharma"?

As for Dana McCaffery, there is some details to be read:
http://transgallaxys.com/~kanzlerzwo/index.php?topic=7551
http://transgallaxys.com/~kanzlerzwo/index.php?topic=7586
http://transgallaxys.com/~kanzlerzwo/index.php?topic=7809

How does Meryl Dorey's despicable behavior fit? I say, it fits her well. It fits perfectly for a totally immoral and ruthless liar whose only interest is to have his will, no matter how many will die for this.

When Meryl Dorey says that she did never ever tell people not to vaccinate, she lies. All she says and writes all the time is nothing but seeding fear, nothing but accusing "big pharma". She knows very well that parents will become afraid of vaccination. So Meryl Dorey is a liar, and, posing such a danger to children unborn and born, to persons of all ages, this menace must be stopped by the state. If we need a lex Meryl Dorey, then it be so. Stop that murdering liar Meryl Dorey. Do it. Do it. Do it! Do it now!


[Typo fixed. ET]

Now to the acid attack. Again, look at the emphasized part:

[*quote*]
Meryl Dorey commented on the petition
 · about 1 month ago
Australian Government: Decriminalise the use of Cansema/Black Salve on human beings

I have personally used black salve and it worked perfectly! I have been cited by the Therapeutic Goods Administration three times now for daring to say this and for selling Elaine Hollingsworth's One Answer to Cancer information DVD. As a citizen of Australia, I have the right to care for my own health in my own way and to discuss this with others. I oppose the tyranny of the TGA.
[*/quote*]

(source: http://www.change.org/en-AU/users/8993331)

The devastating results of the black salve are described here:
http://transgallaxys.com/~kanzlerzwo/index.php?topic=7675

http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Cancer/eschar.html

[*QUOTE*]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't Use Corrosive Cancer Salves (Escharotics)
Stephen Barrett, M.D.

 Many salves, pastes, poultices, and plasters have been applied directly to tumors with the hope of burning them away. Zinc oxide, bloodroot, and several other herbs are common ingredients. Some marketers claim that corrosive agents (sometimes called "black salves") can "draw out" the cancer. In recent years, scientists have found chemicals that can destroy certain superficial skin cancers. Except for these, however, corrosive agents are worthless against cancer and cannot be legally marketed for that purpose in the United States.

Corrosive salves are often referred to as "escharotics" because they produce a thick, dry scab called an "eschar" on the skin. Their use to treat cancer dates back hundreds of years, perhaps even to ancient times. Their use was fairly common during the 18th and 19th centuries. If a tumor is confined to the superficial layers of the skin, it would be possible to burn it off with a corrosive salve or paste. Unfortunately, products capable of accomplishing this can also burn the surrounding normal tissue and result in unnecessary scarring. For superficial cancers—for which the cure rate with standard treatment is nearly 100%—it makes much more sense to use standard methods that can destroy the cancer with little or no damage to the nearby tissues. Some salves are also promoted for treating herpes, venereal, diseases, diabetes, and lupus.

This idea that eschartics can "draw out" cancers from underneath the skin is preposterous. Furthermore, even if a product could do this, it could not influence cancers that have spread (metastasized) to distant regions of the body.

 Some currently marketed escharotics contain bloodroot (Sanguinaria candensis), zinc chloride, or both. However, because cancer salves are not manufactured under government supervision, it may not even be possible to know what is in them. People who use such products without benefit of medical consultation run additional risks. Untrained individuals may incorrectly conclude that a growth is cancerous when it is not. Skin cancers that can spread should be medically investigated to see whether they have done so, and some of these require extensive treatment even though they might not look dangerous to the naked eye. In addition, although escharotics may appear to destroy cancers on the surface of the skin, the user will not be able to tell whether cancer remains under the skin where it can continue to grow without immediate detection.

In 2002, the Archives of Dermatology published a report of four patients who had used escharotic agents instead of standard treatment for a basal cell cancer [1]. In the first patient, the visible tumor was removed and the skin healed. However, a biopsy several months later a biopsy showed that cancer remained under the skin. The second patient successfully eradicated his tumors but sustained severe scarring that required surgery to repair. The third patient had successful surgery for several tumors but was unhappy about tiny scars and the cost of the procedures. When last seen by the authors, he had 2 large swellings covered with a thick central eschar, one on each side of his neck as a result of treatment by an "herbalist." The fourth patient came to the authors with a large basal cell cancer of the nose, lip, and cheek that required extensive surgery to remove and later metastasized to his bones. Several years earlier, when the cancer was in its early stages, he had refused surgery and chosen instead to treat it with an escharotic. The cancer appeared to have been healed, but obviously was not. The authors warned that many of the skin disorders referred to in testimonials published on Web sites that market escharotics were not medically diagnosed so that it would not be possible to judge whether they were benign growths or, if cancerous, had actually been cured. The extreme danger of using escharotics products is illustrated by the experience of Ruth Conrad, an Idaho woman who consulted one of the state's many unlicensed naturopaths in 1984. While seeking treatment for a sore shoulder, she also complained of a bump on her nose. The naturopath stated that it was cancer and gave her a black herbal salve to apply directly. Within a few days, her face became very painful and she developed red streaks that ran down her cheeks. Her anxious phone call to the naturopath brought the explanation that the presence of the lines was a good sign because they "resemble a crab, and cancer is a crab." He also advised her to apply more of the black salve. Within a week, a large part of her face, including her nose, sloughed off. It took 3 years and 17 plastic surgery operations to reconstruct her face. During a deposition, the naturopath stated that he had obtained the salve from a woman in Mexico and that he didn't know who had manufactured it. The picture shows the extent of the injured area.       



http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Gifs/conrad256.jpg


Regulatory Actions

Salves intended for the treatment of cancers cannot be legally marketed. The FDA has banned the importation of all "black salve" products, including Cansema Black, Topical Salve, Cansema Deep Tissue, Cansema w/Lugol's Iodine (topical), Cansema for Cats, Dogs, and Horses, Cansema Tonic I, Cansema Tonic II, Cansema Tonic III, Cansema Capsules, Cansema Suppositories, Bloodroot Paste, C-Herb Paste, CAN-X, Cancerx, H3O, and Healing Formula [2].

In 2004, Gregory James Caton, of Lake Charles, Louisiana, was sentenced to 33 months imprisonment to be followed by 3 years supervised release for marketing several products with claims that they could cure cancer and other diseases. Court documents indicate that from 1999 to 2003, doing business as Alpha Omega Labs, Caton and his employees sold Cancema Tonic III (a purported cancer cure) and H3O (claimed to be effective against athlete's foot, cuts and burns, eczema, fingernail fungus, chronic gas, gastroenteritis, gingivitis and periodontal disease, halitosis, herpes sores, ophthalmia, psoriasis, sore throat, strep throat, and wounds) [3].

In April 2005, the FDA ordered Two Feathers, Inc., of Reno, Nevada, to stop marketing an escharotic salve called Two Feathers [4]

Later in 2005, Lois March, M.D., an ear, nose, and throat specialist who practiced in Cotrell, Georgia, surrendered her medical license to settle charges that she improperly helped Dan Raber, an unlicensed person who treated patients for cancer. Georgia’s Composite Board of Medical Examiners had accused March of providing pain management to several patients whom Raber treated with a bloodroot paste, including one man whose flesh was eaten so badly from his shoulder that the bone was exposed [5]. Press reports indicate that the FDA raided Raber's farm.

In April 2006, the FDA ordered Risingsun Health Alternatives and Herbs, a division of MacAdam Health Enterprises of Livingston, Montana, to stop its illegal marketing of Cansema products [6]. Although the company owner promised several times to stop the illegal marketing, he did not stop. After making several undercover purchases, the FDA obtained a consent decree for a permanent injunction [7,8].

In May 2008, the FDA ordered Best on Earth Products of Las Vegas, Nevada, to stop marketing corrosive salves with claims that they are effective against cancer. The company's Web site had stated:

While historically, black salve and bloodroot salves have been used for melanoma, basal and squamous cell carcinomas. . . we at Best on Earth Products are not legally allowed to make such claims. Such claims made by companies would put these products into the category of "new drugs" based on the FDA definition. Again, we do not make such claims regarding our products."

The company responded by removing the illegal claims but continued to sell black salve products.

The FDA warned that this type of "disclaimer" would not protect against prosecution because other parts of the site (including metatags), had made it clear that the products were intended to treat cancer [9].

In September 2008, the Federal Trade Commission secured a consent agreement with Holly A. Bacon (d/b/a Cleansing Time Pro), who had marketed " black salve" ointment and tablets with claims that both products were effective against all forms of cancer, as well as against hepatitus, HIV, SARS, and Avian Flu and other viruses. The agreement bans her from making unsubstantiated claims about any product [10].
Advocacy by Andrew Weil

Andrew Weil, M.D., who promotes himself as "your trusted health advisor," has been a strong proponent of bloodroot paste. His 1995 book Spontaneous Healing states that after reading a letter from a user he "was able to find a number of references about its peculiar ability to dissolve abnormal growths on the skin without harming normal tissue." Six months later, when his dog got a black growth on his skin, he applied a bloodroot paste, noted that "the whole tumor" fell off after a few days, and concluded that the end result was "a perfectly circular, slightly depressed area of skin, with no trace of tumor." After trying it out on a friend, he began teaching medical students how to use it with outcomes that were "consistent and satisfactory." [11] Reading this account shortly after the book was published, I was struck by four things:
The idea that bloodroot kills only cancer cells and spares normal ones is preposterous.
There was no mention of a biopsy, without which it might not be possible to be certain that his friend had a cancer.
Weil does not mention how he determined that medical students who followed his advice had "consistent and satisfactory outcomes." Some skin cancers that are left behind will not become apparent until months or even years after they are treated. Without a formal follow-up study, it is impossible to determine the long-term outcome.
The naked eye cannot tell where the margin of a skin cancer is located because there can be microscopic spread beyond the obvious tumor. When simple surgery is performed, the surgeon removes the obvious area plus a small amount of surrounding tissue. If the pathology report shows no tumor at the specimen margins, it is assumed that the entire tumor has been removed. If cancer shows at the margins, further surgery is performed. Today, Weil's Web site acknowledges this point by stating "I do not recommend using bloodroot paste, or anything else for that matter, for the self-treatment of skin cancers. It might not get all malignant tissue. Only examination by biopsy can confirm a diagnosis or a cure." [12] However, even this statement is irresponsible because bloodroot paste is not a sensible treatment no matter who applies it. Nevertheless, for more than four years, Weil's Web site carried an article that plugged bloodroot and linked to four companies that would supply information and products [13]

Three More Victims

A recent book, Natural Causes, describes what happened after Weil's Web site persuaded Sue Gilliatt of Indianapolis, Indiana to use bloodroot products. According to the book, her primary care physician removed a bump on her nose that was diagnosed as a benign tumor called a fibroadenoma. But Gilliatt feared that it was cancerous and, even though she was given a referral to a dermatologist, wound up buying Cansema from the Alpha Omega Alpha Web site and a bloodroot paste from Dan Raber. The Cancema stung so badly that she was unable to keep in on for the recommended 24 hours and applied Raber's paste instead. Within a few hours after she applied it to her nose, her face became puffy and her eyes were nearly swollen shut. Instead of consulting her doctor, she phoned Raber who persuaded her to apply more paste. Six days later, when she had her appointment with the dermatologist, a large part of her nose had been destroyed.

Two other black salve victims have shared their stories with me:Gail Bumpus, of Singer Island, Florida, was the victim of 84-year-old Jerome Craft, M.D., a board-certified plastic surgeon who advertised in the Yellow Pages as a specialist in cancer and burns. In 2005, she consulted him about possible surgery for excess skin under her nose. During the first two visits, without taking a biopsy, Craft said that she had extensive cancer in the nose and that a black salve that he had invented would remove the cancer without leaving any scars. After the salve was applied, her nose became extremely painful and her face swelled "like a pumpkin." Although an emergency room physician advised hospitalization, Craft talked her into remaining under his care for ten more days, during which time she experienced excruciating pain but was reassured that she would be fine. When she finally returned to the hospital, she was admitted for five days and treated with massive doses of antibiotics. When the dead tissue was removed from her nasal area, it was apparent that her nose had been burned off. So far she has had six operations to reconstruct a nose. In 2007, the Florida Board of Medicine secured a consent agreement under which Craft was reprimanded, fined $9,000, ordered to pay administrative costs, and banned from using "black salve" again [14].   



http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Cancer/Gifs/bumpus1.gif
Appearance before the salve was applied   



http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Cancer/Gifs/bumpus2.gif
A few days after the salve was applied, most of her nose was destroyed.

In 2006, a woman in Liberty Hill, Texas, developed a small but deep-rooted cancer on the skin of her nose that was biopsied and diagnosed by a dermatologist. Surgery was recommended, but her sister, who has practiced as a "master herbalist" for many years, persuaded her that a bloodroot paste would do a better job. The first picture shows how her nose and the surrounding skin became inflamed. The second picture shows the hole in her nose that resulted. The paste destroyed some areas of bone and cartilage, which meant that when the wound healed, she required extensive plastic surgery. She also reported that the inflamed area was extremely painful for more than a week.       



http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Cancer/Gifs/teel1.gif



http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Cancer/Gifs/teel4.gif


Mohs Surgery

Mohs micrographic surgery is a state-of-the-art treatment for skin cancer in which the physician (usually a dermatologist) serves as surgeon, pathologist, and reconstructive surgeon. It begins with surgical removal of the visible tumor and microscopic examination of the specimen. If cancer is seen at the margins, the suspected area plus a thin margin is removed and the process is repeated until it appears that all of the cancer has been located and removed. The end result is a very high cure rate (over 99% for new cancers and 95% for recurrent cancers) with minimal removal of healthy tissue [15].

The Bottom Line

Skin cancers should be medically diagnosed and treated. Those located in readily visible areas (eyes, nose, lips, or scalp) should be treated with Mohs surgery. The types of products described in this article are extremely dangerous. Their sellers deserve to be imprisoned.

References

McDaniel S. Goldman GD. Consequences of using escharotic agents as primary treatment for nonmelanoma skin cancer. Archives of Dermatology 138:1593-1596, 2002.
Import Alert #66-41: "Unapproved new drugs promoted in the U.S." Revised April 6, 2006.
Lake Charles man sentenced for selling and shipping unapproved new drugs. USDOJ news release, Aug 24, 2004.
Cassens BJ. Warning letter to Two Feathers, Inc., and Robert Roy. April 13, 2005.
In the matter of Lois March, M.D. Before the Georgia Office of State Administrative Hearings. Filed July 26, 2005.
Breen CM. Warning Letter to Greta Armstrong. April 6, 2006.
Complaint for permanent injunction. USA v. Toby Carl McAdam and Greta Armstrong, d/b/a/ Rising Sun Health. Case 1:10-cv-00128-RFC. U.S. District Court for the District of Montana. Filed Oct 13, 2010.
Consent decree of permanent ijunction. USA v. Toby Carl McAdam and Greta Armstrong, d/b/a/ Rising Sun Health. Case 1:10-cv-00128-RFC. U.S. District Court for the District of Montana. Filed Oct 13, 2010.
Cassens B. Warning letter to Best on Earth Products, May 20, 2008.
Agreement containing consent order. In the matter of Holly A. Bacon, doing business as Cleansing Time Pro. FTC file # 082-3119, announced Sept 18, 2008.
Weil A. Spontaneous Healing. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1995, pp 48-51.
Weil A. Bloodroot for skin cancer? Dr. Weil.com, Jan 9, 2006.
Hurley D. Natural Causes: Death, Lies, and Politics in America's Vitamin and Herbal Supplement Industry. New York: Broadway Books, 2006.
Complaint. Florida Department of Health vs. Jerome W. Craft, M.D. DOH case number 2005-03020, filed May 2, 2006.
About Mohs micrographic surgery. American College of Mohs Micrographic Surgery and Cutaneous Oncology Web site, accessed December 12, 2006.

This article was revised on January 1, 2011.

Make a Donation  |  Search All of Our Affiliated Sites  |  Home

Links to Recommended Vendors
Natural Medicines Comprehensive Database. Trustworthy information on dietary supplements and herbs.
PharmacyChecker.com: Compare drug prices and save money at verified online pharmacies.
ConsumerLab.com: Evaluates the quality of dietary supplement and herbal products.
Bukh Law Firm: Free phone consultation for health fraud victims.
OnlyMyEmail: Award-winning anti-spam services.
Herbal Medicine, 3rd edition. Excellent reference book, discount-priced.
10 Types: Website design, development, and hosting with superb technical support.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
[*/QUOTE*]


Despite the TGA retraction order Meryl Dorey still makes false medical claims. How long will it take till she is stopped by a straightjacket? She advertises for the fraud with the etching salve which can have lethal consequences. She still advertises for the fraud months after the retraction order. She lies about vaccination. She harasses parents of dead newborns. She abuses the legal system with AVOs. She makes libeling allegations against her critics.

Can a person be so insane like she acts? Or is she not insane but criminal through and through? How many children died because of her? How many children suffer because of her? How many children are disabled because of her? The legal system is at its limit: either it puts an end to the crimes of Meryl Dorey or it declares its bankruptcy.


[Typo fixed. ET]

[document source: http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles/ni/history/13/0520avnoppt.pdf)

Meryl Dorey is very aggressive. But watch it! See her in the retraction case.

http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles/history/2013/05may.htm#20oppt

[*quote*]
Permalink   
And there's Parliament (20/5/2013)


On May 14, the Health Legislation Amendment Act 2013 came into law in New South Wales. The loophole in the 1993 legislation that allowed the AVN to escape its responsibilities last year and claim a massive victory has been closed. Now any concerned citizen can make a complaint to the Health Care Complaints Commission about any quack. And Parliament is now talking about legislation to restrict access of the pox-ridden offspring of vaccine deniers to kindergartens and child care centres. And in the Federal Parliament instructions have been given to health bureaucrats by the relevant Minister that henceforth people who claim to be "conscientious objectors" to vaccination (in order to steal government benefits tied to full vaccination of their children) will be officially called "vaccine refusers".

New!
Permalink   
And then there's the TGA (20/5/2013)

Some time ago Meryl Dorey appeared on the Internet radio station Fair Dinkum Radio and promoted Black Salve as a cure for cancer. This is an escharotic paste, that is it is a caustic preparation that effectively dissolves any tissues it comes in contact with. It is about as useful a cancer cure as burning cancer away with a blowtorch, although it works a little slower. The Therapeutic Goods Administration politely asked Ms Dorey and Leon Pittard at the radio station to display a notice on their web sites admitting that they had been promoting this dangerous and useless nostrum. They refused. The TGA has now gone one step further and issued an order, not a request, to display the following notice on the AVN web site.



(image source: http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles/history/2013/0520avntga.jpg)

Heels are being dug in and resistance is building. What is different now is that a couple of newspapers have decided to take on the AVN and all its idiocy, and stories like the one at the right are regularly appearing. (The particular story never made it to the paper's web site, so a picture is as good as it gets.)

Here is the text of the retraction. It should be noted that the TGA set specifications for the size of the retraction and the font colour and size. It also has to be displayed as HTML code, not as an image (which is how most crooks try to avoid such notices being indexed by search engines).

RETRACTION

An advertisement promoting illegal therapeutic goods under the name “Black Salve”, which we published on this website, should not have been published. In publishing the advertisement, we misled and abused the trust of consumers.

In the advertisement we unlawfully made claims that Black Salve is safe, and that it can be used as an effective treatment for cancers including skin cancer. We also claimed that cancer medicines are harmful and cause cancer, and are ineffectual.

A complaint about the advertisement was recently upheld by the Complaints Resolution Panel. We provided no evidence whatsoever to support the claims we made, and the Panel found that the claims were unlawful, misleading, and unverified and breached the Therapeutic Goods Advertising Code (Code).

The full text of the Panel’s determination can be found at: www.tgacrp.com.au/complaints

The delegate of the Secretary for the purposes of regulation 9 of the Therapeutic Goods Regulations 1990 also found that the claims and representation in the advertisement were unlawful, inaccurate and misleading in breach of the Code.

The attention of consumers is directed to the safety information from the Therapeutic Goods Administration at: http://www.tga.gov.au/consumers/information-salve-cansema.htm

You can read the entire order here.
http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles/history/2013/0520avntga.pdf


New!
Permalink   
But wait, there's more (20/5/2013)

As part of the continuous process of monitoring and investigating the AVN and its interaction with government authorities, the correspondence between the TGA and the AVN over Black Salve was acquired under Freedom of Information rules. Most of it was just a to-and-fro of argument about the legality or otherwise of selling or advertising products and what the definitions of words like "advertise" really are. Then, right at the end, Ms Dorey threw down what she assumed would be her trump card. She claimed Freeman Of The Land protection.

I won't go into details of this particular form of insanity here, but it is based on the idea that each person is actually two people - a person and that person's Personal Representative. One of these people (I'm not sure which) is a legal fiction who has no contract with the government or any other institutions of society and therefore is not bound by any obligations to pay taxes, rent or bank interest or to be restricted in action by any law of the government, governments being themselves legal fictions that don't really exist. Or something like that. Look up "Freeman Of The Land" and "One People's Private Trust" in your favourite search engine, but be sitting down and be prepared to laugh heartily at how insane people can be and still manage to turn on a computer.

I listened to Leon Pittard at Fair Dinkum Radio rant on about this nonsense once, so I know where Merly Dorey got the idea. She wrote to the official in the TGA in "his private capacity" (that is, as his Personal Representative, not the physical man behind a desk in Canberra) and tried to set things right. Read. Enjoy. Click on the picture for a larger version. (I have redacted the name of the official. He is probably still laughing, but he doesn't need his name associated with idiocy.)


(document source: http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles/ni/history/13/0520avnoppt.pdf)

See more PhD Comics here
May 11, 2013
[*/quote*]

There goes...

the url of the above quote: http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles/comment/avn.htm

Meryl Dorey plays foul. She abuses the legal system to down and gag her critics. Here is a report of yesterday:

[*quote*]
The AVO makes the news (20/5/2013)
I woke up on Monday morning to find my Twitter stream and Facebook timeline full reports of a story in the Sydney Daily Telegraph.



Image source: http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles/history/2013/0520avntele.jpg

The words said:

THE founder of a controversial anti-immunisation group has been accused of using apprehended violence orders to gag her critics. Former Australian Vaccination Network president Meryl Dorey has applied for AVOs against three of her most vocal opponents. As a special condition of the AVOs, she wanted the men banned from making online comments about her in "any derogatory manner".

But she suffered a setback last month when her AVO was thrown out against one critic, Peter Bowditch, who she claimed posted harassing and abusive messages online.

She also took out an AVO against Daniel Raffaele, who helped start the Stop the Australian Vaccination Network group, claiming he made threatening calls to her. Mr Raffaele, who denied making any threatening calls, said he eventually agreed to the order because he was "sick of dealing with it", although he made sure her "gag order" was struck out. "The only thing I was never going to agree to was being silenced on the internet," Mr Raffaele said. "The information (the AVN) spread is dangerous and it's not based on anything other than lies - and it costs lives."

In his submissions to court, Mr Bowditch said he lived 750km from Ms Dorey's home at Bangalow, near Byron Bay, so there was little chance he would come into contact with her if she genuinely feared for her safety. "It is obvious to me that this application ... is actually an attempt to prevent me speaking about or criticising (her) activities," he said.

Western Australia-based Dan Buzzard, another AVN opponent, said Ms Dorey probably saw taking out the AVOs as a "quick and easy" way to silence her critics. He will defend the application today. [Note: the paper got it wrong - the hearing is scheduled for Friday, May 24]

Ms Dorey refused to comment on the applications but denied using the AVOs to shut up her opponents. She said she had received anonymous death threats and had only taken the AVOs out at the suggestion of police. Ms Dorey accused The Daily Telegraph of running a campaign against parents who chose not to vaccinate their children and said she was still "taking legal advice" on appealing the magistrate's decision to dismiss her AVO against Mr Bowditch.

Meanwhile, Premier Barry O'Farrell said he would consider new laws giving childcare centres the power to refuse entry to kids who had not been vaccinated, one of the aims of The Daily Telegraph and The Sunday Telegraph's No Jab, No Play campaign. He said the government was committed to lifting the number of vaccinated children.

You can read the story in the Daily Telegraph.
[*/quote*]


Isn't this


(http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles/history/2013/0520avntele.jpg)
nearer to the truth than this foto?


(http://d22r54gnmuhwmk.cloudfront.net/photos/8/if/eh/ouIfehNQWIokcmB-172x172-cropped.jpg]

Look at the emphasized part:

[*quote*]
Meryl Dorey commented on the petition
 · about 1 month ago
Australian Government: Decriminalise the use of Cansema/Black Salve on human beings

I have personally used black salve and it worked perfectly! I have been cited by the Therapeutic Goods Administration three times now for daring to say this and for selling Elaine Hollingsworth's One Answer to Cancer information DVD. As a citizen of Australia, I have the right to care for my own health in my own way and to discuss this with others. I oppose the tyranny of the TGA.
[*/quote*]

Note: That happened "about 1 month ago". Which is a long time after Meryl Dorey was forced to retract her false claims about the black salve.

source:
http://www.change.org/en-AU/users/8993331

[*quote*]
change.org 
k Start a petition 
l Browse 
f   
 Login or Sign Up   
 
Meryl Dorey

BANGALOW, Australia

Recent Activity
Meryl Dorey recruited M to sign the petition
 · 10 days ago
NSW Government, The Newspapers and Media: Say NO to Compulsory Vaccination

Meryl Dorey recruited Therese to sign the petition
 · 11 days ago
NSW Government, The Newspapers and Media: Say NO to Compulsory Vaccination

Meryl Dorey recruited Kate  to sign the petition
 · 11 days ago
NSW Government, The Newspapers and Media: Say NO to Compulsory Vaccination

Meryl Dorey recruited Kerrie to sign the petition
 · 11 days ago
NSW Government, The Newspapers and Media: Say NO to Compulsory Vaccination

Meryl Dorey recruited Ann to sign the petition
 · 11 days ago
NSW Government, The Newspapers and Media: Say NO to Compulsory Vaccination

Meryl Dorey recruited Renata to sign the petition
 · 11 days ago
NSW Government, The Newspapers and Media: Say NO to Compulsory Vaccination

Meryl Dorey recruited Paul to sign the petition
 · 11 days ago
NSW Government, The Newspapers and Media: Say NO to Compulsory Vaccination

Meryl Dorey recruited Phillippa to sign the petition
 · 11 days ago
NSW Government, The Newspapers and Media: Say NO to Compulsory Vaccination

Meryl Dorey recruited Kelly to sign the petition
 · 11 days ago
NSW Government, The Newspapers and Media: Say NO to Compulsory Vaccination

Meryl Dorey recruited Laureen to sign the petition
 · 11 days ago
NSW Government, The Newspapers and Media: Say NO to Compulsory Vaccination

Meryl Dorey recruited Kim to sign the petition
 · 11 days ago
NSW Government, The Newspapers and Media: Say NO to Compulsory Vaccination

Meryl Dorey recruited Chris to sign the petition
 · 11 days ago
NSW Government, The Newspapers and Media: Say NO to Compulsory Vaccination

Meryl Dorey signed the petition
 · 11 days ago
NSW Government, The Newspapers and Media: Say NO to Compulsory Vaccination

Meryl Dorey recruited Anna to sign the petition
 · 28 days ago
Australian Government: Decriminalise the use of Cansema/Black Salve on human beings

Meryl Dorey recruited Fran to sign the petition
 · about 1 month ago
Australian Government: Decriminalise the use of Cansema/Black Salve on human beings

Meryl Dorey recruited Chris to sign the petition
 · about 1 month ago
Australian Government: Decriminalise the use of Cansema/Black Salve on human beings

Meryl Dorey recruited john to sign the petition
 · about 1 month ago
Australian Government: Decriminalise the use of Cansema/Black Salve on human beings

Meryl Dorey recruited Lorraine to sign the petition
 · about 1 month ago
Australian Government: Decriminalise the use of Cansema/Black Salve on human beings

Meryl Dorey recruited Annika to sign the petition
 · about 1 month ago
Australian Government: Decriminalise the use of Cansema/Black Salve on human beings

Meryl Dorey recruited Agnieszka to sign the petition
 · about 1 month ago
Australian Government: Decriminalise the use of Cansema/Black Salve on human beings

Meryl Dorey recruited Damian to sign the petition
 · about 1 month ago
Australian Government: Decriminalise the use of Cansema/Black Salve on human beings

Meryl Dorey recruited Catherine to sign the petition
 · about 1 month ago
Australian Government: Decriminalise the use of Cansema/Black Salve on human beings

Meryl Dorey recruited Heather to sign the petition
 · about 1 month ago
Australian Government: Decriminalise the use of Cansema/Black Salve on human beings

Meryl Dorey recruited Craig to sign the petition
 · about 1 month ago
Australian Government: Decriminalise the use of Cansema/Black Salve on human beings

Meryl Dorey recruited John to sign the petition
 · about 1 month ago
Australian Government: Decriminalise the use of Cansema/Black Salve on human beings

Meryl Dorey commented on the petition
 · about 1 month ago
Australian Government: Decriminalise the use of Cansema/Black Salve on human beings

I have personally used black salve and it worked perfectly! I have been cited by the Therapeutic Goods Administration three times now for daring to say this and for selling Elaine Hollingsworth's One Answer to Cancer information DVD. As a citizen of Australia, I have the right to care for my own health in my own way and to discuss this with others. I oppose the tyranny of the TGA.

Meryl Dorey signed the petition
 · about 1 month ago
Australian Government: Decriminalise the use of Cansema/Black Salve on human beings

Meryl Dorey recruited Cyndi to sign the petition
 · 5 months ago
Nepean Health Service: I want answers about my son's death and his deleted records

Meryl Dorey recruited Kim to sign the petition
 · 5 months ago
Nepean Health Service: I want answers about my son's death and his deleted records

 Meryl Dorey commented on the petition
 · 5 months ago
Nepean Health Service: I want answers about my son's death and his deleted records

Medical doctors are nearly the number 1 cause of death in Australia and most other developed countries. They must be held accountable for the harm they can cause. Doctors should not be covering up for other doctors.

Meryl Dorey signed the petition
 · 5 months ago
Nepean Health Service: I want answers about my son's death and his deleted records

Meryl Dorey recruited Fiona to sign the petition
 · about 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Mindano to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited David to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Annie to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Christina to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Deborah to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Joanna to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Andre to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited gail to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Protect University Education in Natural Medicine

Meryl Dorey recruited Kathy to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Protect University Education in Natural Medicine

Meryl Dorey recruited Donna to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Protect University Education in Natural Medicine

Meryl Dorey recruited Tina to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Protect University Education in Natural Medicine

Meryl Dorey recruited Lilia to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Protect University Education in Natural Medicine

Meryl Dorey recruited Marissa to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Protect University Education in Natural Medicine

Meryl Dorey recruited Joan to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Protect University Education in Natural Medicine

Meryl Dorey recruited Aneeta to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Protect University Education in Natural Medicine

Meryl Dorey recruited Natalie to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Protect University Education in Natural Medicine

Meryl Dorey signed the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Protect University Education in Natural Medicine

Meryl Dorey recruited Carole to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited R to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Donna to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey signed the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Sanofi Pasteur - Truth Now!

Meryl Dorey recruited Florian to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Matt to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Tess to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Federal and State Governments of Australia: Stop Aus. Govt. Funds for Mental Health Screening of our Children.

 Meryl Dorey commented on the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Federal and State Governments of Australia: Stop Aus. Govt. Funds for Mental Health Screening of our Children.

When the government tries to make childhood a pathological condition, it is sign that our leaders have gone mad! Let them stick to infrastructure and keeping the streets safe. They have no place trying to tell us how to raise our kids or what treatments we use to keep our families healthy.

Meryl Dorey signed the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Federal and State Governments of Australia: Stop Aus. Govt. Funds for Mental Health Screening of our Children.

Meryl Dorey recruited Daphne to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Paul to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited tremora to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Jessica to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Mark to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Nevine to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited maha to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Marcel to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Christine to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Neil to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Narelle to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Nimrod to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited linda to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Katy to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Bree  to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Brigitta to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Catherine to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Aneeta to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Tone  to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Andrew to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Allison to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Anna to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Anne to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey signed the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey started the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Impact
7
Actions
72
Recruits
Started by Meryl

Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children
3,036 Supporters 

Top CausesHuman Rights
2 Actions
36 Recruits
Health
2 Actions
13 Recruits
Education
1 Action
8 Recruits

Friends
View all 68 friends 2


change.org
g
Z

Empowering people everywhere to create the change they want to see.
About
 · Staff
 · Jobs
 · Blog 

B CorpWe're proud to be a certified B Corp, using the power of business for social good.


k Start a petition
Victories
 · Tips & Guides 
nChange.org for
Organisations
_ Contact us
Help
 · Press
 · Legal
 · Advertise 
 
In the press
The New York Times
CNN
Bloomber Buidnessweek
© 2013, Change.org Inc. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy
 · Terms of Service
 · Ad Guidelines
 · Developers
[*quote*]


[Typo fixed. ET]

.

Do not forget James MacArthur!

Do not forget freedom!

Do not forget your rights!