TG-1 * Transgallaxys Forum 1

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10]
 91 
 on: April 14, 2017, 05:21:20 PM 
Started by worelia - Last post by Krant
In der Schule lernt man, daß die Griechen vor 2000 Jahren den Durchmesser der Erdkugel berechnet haben. Wie konnte die Menschheit seitdem nur so verblöden?


 92 
 on: April 14, 2017, 05:10:54 PM 
Started by Thymian - Last post by NoRPthun
Hätten sie. Haben sie aber nicht! Weil sie ein Brett vor dem Kopf haben. Sonst wären sie nicht bei Facebook. Facebook ist eine Negativselektion.

 93 
 on: April 14, 2017, 05:05:57 PM 
Started by Thymian - Last post by Krant
Hadmut Danisch schreibt:

"In Frankreich hätten sie angeblich 30.000 Accounts vor der Präsidentenwahl auf stumm geschaltet."
(http://www.danisch.de/blog/2017/04/14/there-is-no-free-lunch/)

30.000. Ja und!? Selbst wenn es nur 1000 wären, warum gehen die nicht ins freie Internet? Da hin, wo ihnen keiner in die Suppe spuckt! Mit 1000 Accounts kann man eine ganze Menge anstellen. Für 20 Euro kriegt man Webspace und einen eigenen FTP-Zugang. Mehr braucht man doch nicht. Dafür ist das WWW doch da. DAFÜR!!!!!!


 94 
 on: April 14, 2017, 04:58:29 PM 
Started by Thymian - Last post by Krant
 8) Koinzidenz.  ;D

 95 
 on: April 14, 2017, 04:57:37 PM 
Started by Thymian - Last post by Krant
Der Netzterrorismus bei Facebook eskaliert. Es wird immer einseitiger. Aber es soll keiner sagen, er wäre nicht gewarnt worden! Da sind große Pages und Gruppenarbeiten deleted worden. Wenn die Autoren dann nicht einmal Sicherheitskopien gemacht haben, nicht mal eine einzige, sind zehn Jahre auf einen Schlag ausgelöscht. In den Zeitungsarchiven wird es den einen oder anderen Artikel darüber geben. Hat es was genützt? Nein, Die Leute sind unbelehrbar.


[*quote*]
Keine Freiheit
Imad Karim auf Facebook gelöscht
Von Tichys Einblick
Fr, 14. April 2017

Das Nutzerprofil des deutsch-libanesischen Schriftstellers und Filmemachers Imad Karim wurde auf Facebook gelöscht. Meinungsfreiheit geht anders.

Das Nutzerprofil des deutsch-libanesischen Schriftstellers und Filmemachers Imad Karim wurde auf Facebook gelöscht. Das Unternehmen reagiert in vorauseilendem Gehorsam auf die Zensurinitiative des Bundesjustizministers, der die Bundesregierung folgt. Während weiterhin pro-islamistische Seiten ungestört zu Hass und Mord aufrufen können, werden kritische Geister gesperrt oder gelöscht.

Er sagt uns dazu:

    "Als Heranwachsender erlebte ich mit 15 bis 19 Jahre staatliche Willkür im Libanon, jetzt 40 Jahre später, wiederholen sich bestimmte Erlebnisse."

Wir stellen Ihnen hier zwei Beiträge vor, die Imad Karim bei uns veröffentlicht hat:

Eine Liebeserklärung an Deutschland und seine Kultur, aus der Feder eines vor religiöser Intoleranz geflohenen Mannes besonders wertvoll: Gilt doch neuen Ankömmlingen oft Deutschland als ein Land und Leute, die nicht ihre werden sollen.

    Ihr meine Kinder, rettet mein Deutschland
    https://www.tichyseinblick.de/gastbeitrag/ihr-meine-kinder-rettet-mein-deutschland/


Und ein Interview, dass er mit dem Islam-Kritiker Hamed Abdel-Samad geführt hat. Hamed Abdel-Samad steht unter ständigem Polizeischutz, weil radikale Islamisten wiederholt Morddrohungen gegen ihn ausgestoßen haben. Aktuell ist Abdel-Samad in einer viel beachteten Dokumentation „Europas Muslime“ auf ARTE zu sehen.

    Hamed Abdel-Samad und Imad Karim sprechen gegen Islamisierung und Islam-Verbände

Bei Cicero erschienen von Imad Karim:

    Jedes Unrecht beginnt mit einer Lüge
    Islamische Werte frei Haus

Imad Karim – deutscher Regisseur, Drehbuchautor, Fernsehjournalist und Filmautor. Er ist libanesischer Herkunft und seit Ende 1977 in Südwestdeutschland ansässig.

Seine Filme wurden in den Fernsehanstalten WDR, hr, BR, MDR, ORB, SR, SWR, NDR, 3Sat, Phoenix und im ersten ARD-Programm ausgestrahlt und mehrmals wiederholt. Somit erreichten die Themen seiner Dokumentationen Millionen Zuschauer.

Imad Karim gehörte jahrelang verschiedenen Filmjuries an und er ist selber Träger verschiedener Fernsehpreise u.a. des CICIS Medienpreises für Integration.
Anzeige
Recommendations powered by plista

Seit 2001 leitet er die von ihm gegründete Filmproduktionsfirma Strong Shadow Media.


Unterstützung

Wenn Ihnen unser Artikel gefallen hat: Unterstützen Sie diese Form des Journalismus.
oder €

Copyright Tichys Einblick 2017
[*/quote*]

Hier geht es zu den Texten und weiteren Artikel:

https://www.tichyseinblick.de/daili-es-sentials/imad-karim-auf-facebook-geloescht/

Den einen Link habe ich reingetan. Die anderen müßt Ihr bei Tichy's Einblick selber raussuchen.

Tichys Einblick darf man durch Spenden unterstützen. Darf man und sollte man!

 96 
 on: April 14, 2017, 04:31:58 PM 
Started by Thymian - Last post by NoRPthun
Hadmut Danisch

[*quote*]
Hadmut Danisch
Ansichten eines Informatikers

Wer mein Blog unterstützen möchte, kann spenden:
Per Überweisung:
Hadmut Danisch
Berliner Bank
Konto 305193500
BLZ 10070848
IBAN DE45100708480305193500
BIC/SWIFT DEUTDEDB110

Per Paypal:
(Paypal zieht Provision ab)


There is no free lunch

Hadmut
14.4.2017 16:55

Sagt mal, Leute, glaubt Ihr wirklich, dass Euch die Dienstleistungen vom Himmel regnen?

Bei mir kommen gerade jede Menge Hinweise unterschiedlicher Seriosität und Nachprüfbarkeit rein, wonach bei Facebook gerade aus Angst vor Maas derartig viele Facebook-Accounts abgeschaltet werden, dass das Waldsterben dagegen wie Kindergeburtstag aussieht. In Frankreich hätten sie angeblich 30.000 Accounts vor der Präsidentenwahl auf stumm geschaltet. Und so weiter.

Äh, Leute, jetzt muss ich doch mal blöd fragen:

Glaubt Ihr alle wirklich, dass da eine amerikanische Firma vorbeikommt um Euch so ganz kostenlos und nur in Eurem Interesse die Webseiten macht?

Was glaubt Ihr eigentlich, warum Facebook das macht?

Weil die Geld verdienen wollen. Eure Interessen interessieren die einen Scheiß, wenn es über deren Geschäftsinteressen hinausgeht.

Wieso glaubt Ihr, dass sich Facebook in ...
[*/quote*]

Hier geht's weiter:
http://www.danisch.de/blog/2017/04/14/there-is-no-free-lunch/


Gegen kostenlos ist überhaupt nichts zu sagen, wirklich nicht. Aber die Abschottung, daß man eingetragen sein muß um lesen zu können, das ist eine Sauerei. Und wie die Dinge, die die User sich dort aufgebaut haben, hin- und her geschmissen werden, wie jahrelange Arbeit von einer Sekunde zur andern vernichtet wird, das ist eine Sauerei. Die hirnlosen Entscheidungen der Admins, das ist eine Sauerei. Facebook sollte auf der Stelle komplett abgeschaltet werden.

 97 
 on: April 13, 2017, 11:39:28 PM 
Started by worelia - Last post by worelia
The mysterious disappearance leads to the question how real the whole appearance was. And, yes, it was real!

http://web.archive.org/web/20160923190529/http://www.theijst.com/2016-2/august-16

[*quote*]
15    The Geocentric Model of the Earth: Physics and Astronomy Arguments

Kharroubi Amira & Touir Jamel

[View] [Download PDF]
   22    9
[*/quote*]


Between numbers 14 and 16 is number 15:

[*quote*]
14    

Employee Development Strategies and Employees’ Commitment among Academic Staff of Universities in Ekiti State, Nigeria

Adelugba Bisola Iyabo, Ajayi Omobola M., Ogunkolade S. O., Enitilo Olalekan & Gbadebo A.

[View] [Download PDF]
   17    9
15    

The Geocentric Model of the Earth: Physics and Astronomy Arguments

Kharroubi Amira & Touir Jamel

[View] [Download PDF]
   22    9

16    

Climate Change Effects on Rainfall Patterns and It’ S Implications on Sorghum and Millet Production in Kenya: A Review

A. Egesa Ogolla, N. Njau, P. Mwirigi, C. Muui W., N. Korir Kibet & M. Mwangi

[View] [Download PDF]
   31    25
[*/quote*]


Today there is a vacuum...

http://www.theijst.com/2016-2/august-16

[*quote*]
14    

Study of Thunderstorms over a Madhya Pradesh Region, India

Shweta Thakur, Rahul Shrivastava & Varsha Kachneriya

[View] [Download PDF]
   118    65
15    

Employee Development Strategies and Employees’ Commitment among Academic Staff of Universities in Ekiti State, Nigeria

Adelugba Bisola Iyabo, Ajayi Omobola M., Ogunkolade S. O., Enitilo Olalekan & Gbadebo A.

[View] [Download PDF]
   146    70
16    

Climate Change Effects on Rainfall Patterns and It’ S Implications on Sorghum and Millet Production in Kenya: A Review

A. Egesa Ogolla, N. Njau, P. Mwirigi, C. Muui W., N. Korir Kibet & M. Mwangi

[View] [Download PDF]
   212    207
[*/quote*]


Weird. The list was rearranged, and the article did not only vanish, no, it was replaced. There were 22 articles, and after the disappearance there still are 22 articles...

 98 
 on: April 13, 2017, 10:53:29 PM 
Started by worelia - Last post by worelia
Why does Nidhal Guessoum not give any names? It does not take much to find Kharroubi Amira as the infamous PhD student and Touir Jamel as being the professor involved.

The quotes Nidhal Guessoum cites in his article, where are they in the original???


This is the relatively short text of the "thesis":

http://www.theijst.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/9.-ST1608-011.pdf 

As the original pdf file is gone, interested readers can find a copy with the web archive:

http://web.archive.org/web/20160925142646/http://www.theijst.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/9.-ST1608-011.pdf

[*quote*]
The International Journal Of Science & Technoledge (ISSN 2321 – 919X)
http://www.theijst.com
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLEDGE

The Geocentric Model of the Earth: Physics and Astronomy Arguments
Kharroubi Amira
Ph.D. Student, Department of Geography, National Engineering School of Sfax, Sfax University,
Laboratory Water, Energy, Environment (L3E), Sfax, Tunisia

Touir Jamel
Lecturer, Department of Geography, Faculty of Sciences of Sfax, Sfax University,
Laboratory Water, Energy, Environment (L3E), Sfax, Tunisia

Abstract:

Several astronomical observations have shown the presence of numerous failings in heliocentric model such as Mercury
retrograde motion, cosmic rays and Perseids meteors. Numerous researchers are talking about these topics. Because there
is no empirical evidence that the Earth actually orbits the sun, astronomy observations/ geophysics arguments provide
proofs for the steady Earth and the Sun’s motion. The main contention of the paper is to demonstrate the flaws in gravity and
relativity, and to disprove the alleged motions of the earth that for so long time has been unjustifiably taught.
Keywords: Earth, Sun, revolution, physics, retrograde motion, solar system

1. Introduction

Understanding cosmos occupies an extremely significant position in scientific researches. Since antiquity, the Earth is considered stable without any motion and it is the center of this universe (geocentric model). However, Nicolas Copernic, Kepler and Galileo findings show, that the Earth is not stationary (heliocentric model) and that it has nine motions. This heliocentric model, which leans in illusion, takes the example of a ship state leaving the port. In this case, the ship appears stationary (in reality it is in motion) and the port (fixed on reality) move from his initial position. Then, starting with a hypothesis, we try to explain an observation by insisting on the theory accuracy. This led to suggest illogical theory which becomes a reality, forgetting that it is an assumption. Since the inception of this mathematical theory, it has confronted several problems leading to propose new hypotheses to justify its validity.

First, there has been an explanation of the four seasons’ alternation by the assumption of an annual Earth spinning around the Sun in an elliptic orbit. Second, there has been an explanation of the planet’s motion around the Sun by suggesting the existence of gravitational force between different planets. Third, the justification of night/ day alternation has been proposed by suggesting the Earth daily revolution around its imaginary axis. In addition, the temperature change is explained during the four seasons via the postulation of 23.5 ° inclination of the Earth rotation axis to its orbit around the Sun. Also, the assumption of a huge distance between Earth / Sun unites the mathematical theory and physical knowledge. Furthermore, sunspots are justified by suggesting that the Sun rotates around itself. Moreover, the Moon rotation is supposed monthly, not daily, around the Earth from west to east (contradict with observation). And suggesting that there was fixed stars’ motion: according to Einstein the entire universe is in permanent motion.

For some years, scientific researches have evolved towards a more coherent understanding of nature and universes. So, several physicists and astronomers have demonstrated the presence of several flaws in earlier theories.

[1-5] refute the works and the methodology (inductive arguments) of Newton for the reason that is a “chimera” not related to any observation. According to [6-12], they show the presence of numerous gaps in Newton and Einstein laws “Relativityis fundamentally wrong...” [6].

Hence, the heliocentric theory, and all related theories, based only on theoretical proposals have never been argued by terrestrial observations of the sky or through satellite images or Moon [13] said: “However, if we stay and observe it for a few hours, it will not change its position in the sky. This is strange behavior, since here on the Earth we are used to seeing the Moon moving across the sky from east to west”). Thus, all the complex calculations and “imaginary” assumptions, which are not related to any veracity, are only solutions to the problems faced by this theory. The purpose of this paper is to prove through a variety of arguments, taking into account all the previous flaws of the heliocentric model, the stationarity of the Earth in the universe and the Sun spinning around it.

2. Methods

Falsifiability of hypothesis or theory is an intrinsic possibility to prove it to be false. In order to prove Earth stationarity in the cosmos and Sun’s motion, aside bibliographic data, a profound review of two complementary fields is used. On the one hand, we have used physical/ geophysical arguments (hydrodynamic laws, atmospheric characteristics, mass-energy equivalence formula, neutrinos speed, gravity formula, objects kinematics). On the other, we have employed self-observations (daily surveillance of the Moon positions,

57
 Vol 4 Issue 8
 August, 2016
The International Journal Of Science & Technoledge (ISSN 2321 – 919X)
 www.theijst.com

daily observation of the sun/Moon shifting, surveillance of the shadow direction, surveillance of sunrise time at the equinox,
observation of the star’s position, laboratory experiment).

3. Result and Discussion
3.1. Bibliographic Data

 First, Michelson-Morley experiment in 1887 [14] shows the stationarity of the Earth. A light ray is split into two perpendicular component paths, A and B have an equal length. Path A is in the direction of Earth motion and path B at a right angle to A.expected that, due to Earth motion, the time to travel path A would be less than the time to travel path B, but no such interferencenoted. The two light beams arrived at the same time proving then the Earth stationarity.

Second, [15-16]show the existence of particles traveling faster than the light speed. When he experienced his system of wireless transmission of energy, [15] transmitted longitudinal electric waves through the interior of the Earth, which propagate at a speed oftimes the light speed. Based on satellite data from Pioneer 10 and 11 [16] shows the existence of an “anomalous” Doppler shift inradio signals received from these satellites. The Iraqi nuclear physicist [17-18] demonstrated that energy isn’t related to the masshe proposed a new mass-energy equivalence formula (E= m*b*c, where b is a new derived universal constant in term of speedand equal 0.2014 of light speed). The works of [19-23] in the quantum cosmology show the existence of a faster than light speeds.

Physicists at the CERN laboratory, [24-27] prove the existence of superluminal particles called neutrinos travel faster than thespeed. The mass-energy equivalence formula (E=mc2) is defined when “c” is constant and it is the maximum speed ofFurthermore, when “c” is a constant, energy must be proportional to the mass, but in the case of neutrinos, we are in the opposite condition. The neutrino mass equal 0.06 electron volts (eV), which is far less than a billionth of the mass of a proton (1.67262E-270,938273 GeV) = 1,06959E-37kg and energy = 10 6 GeV) [28-34]. As shown above, “c” is variable, mass is not related to energy,formula must be revised. Since the general relativity formula, physically unproven and incompatible with quantum mechanics, isthere are not any justifications for the Earth spinning.

Third, NAZA scientific findings shows that Sun has a revolution not around Earth but around the Lactic Way Galaxy and it has aapex (the velocity of the Sun's orbit around the galaxy is about 220 km/s and thus its orbital period is about 240 million yearsThis apex is an imaginary point in the Hercules constellation, near the bright star Vega (the speed of the Sun = 20km/s). Accordingthis fact, heliocentric model (Sun is fixed in solar system) is rejected.

As well known, all planets have a retrograde motion. If the Sun has an attraction force on planets to make them spinning, we never perceive this motion kind. According to the heliocentric model, planets motions have constantly a counterclockwise direction around Sun exempt Venus and Uranus (clockwise direction) [36]. The observation of this retrograde motion and the rotation direction leadsuspect the entire heliocentric theory.

Also, depending on the planets arrangement in the solar system, Mercury is at a distance of 58 million km (0.39 AU) from the SunPluto in 6000 million km (39 AU). Since the Sun’s attraction force reaches Pluto, and in order to make it spinning, the Mercury rotation cannot be held regarding the magnitude of the gravitational influence. At such condition, the planet Mercury should haveswallowed by the Sun.

It is
is
1.6
the
and
units
light
light.
kg=
this
false,
solar
[35].
to
us
and
been

3.2. Sun / Moon Observations

A daily observation of the Moon for a lunar month shows the existence of different rising positions. Currently, the crescents progress during each lunar month is explained by the Moon monthly revolution around Earth. But, this is unacceptable because we see every night Moon during the first half of lunar month rising from its appearance point and continuing revolution to the West until disappearance under the West horizon. During the 14th night, the Moon goes across the sky from the extreme East to the extreme West. During the first and the second half of lunar month, the Moon rises from West and East respectively, but its propagation direction is always from East to West. This is clearly visible during the first and the second half of lunar month for the earliest and the latest half of night correspondingly. If the Moon follows the Earth rotation from West to East, we no longer observe these rising positions during the lunar month. The record of the Moon position, daily at the sunset, during a lunar month allows drawing its analemma. Indeed, thus obtained analemma shape shows the “eight number” providing then the Moon kinematic. Such configuration reflects the Moon intertropical journey. If the Moon completes a single revolution around the earth monthly (heliocentric model) the analemma must be elliptical. Then, regarding the analemma shape and observations, the Moon revolves around the earth daily. The diversity of the rising positions is explicated then by the following cycle:

The Moon starts its journey from the equator → goes to the Capricorn tropic → go back to the equator (14th day) → goes to the
Cancer tropic → come back to the equator for a new cycle.

A direct observed phenomenon allows proving the earth stationarity. This one consists to register the position of the moon and the sun, in the sky, during a lunar month after an eclipse event (when sun, moon and earth are aligned). Let us take the case of the heliocentric model. If the Sun is fixed at a distance of 150M km from the earth, the moon has a backward motion with a slow velocity at 340000 km and the Earth have a forward move with a more important speed than the moon. With time progress, the angle α between the line of the earth/sun and the earth/moon increase rapidly contrasting with observation. For the geocentric model where the earth is steady, the sun, and the moon have a forward motion. Sun speed is lightly fast then the moon and the distance between celestial bodies is more convincing. With time progress, the angle α between the line of earth/sun and earth/moon increase regularly (the shifting angle is 11,9° daily) in agreement with sky surveillance (Fig.1). During the first half of the lunar month, the moon position in the sky is behind the sun and distance between them begin tiny then it increases progressively until the fourteen day of the month where it gets

58
 Vol 4 Issue 8
 August, 2016
The International Journal Of Science & Technoledge (ISSN 2321 – 919X)
http://www.theijst.com

at the maximum (the sun at the extreme west and the moon at the extreme east). During the second half of the month, the moon position in the sky is in front of the sun and angle between them decrease regularly until the sun reach the moon at the twenty-eighth day. At the new crescent this cycle starts again.

Figure 1: Position of sun and moon in the sky

Another observation allows suspecting the heliocentric model. In the same meridian, time is identical especially at the equinoxthe Sun position is on equator: The Sun rises typically from south to north of the meridian at an equal time. If the Earth axis23.5° tilt to the orbit, in the same meridian, Sunrise must have an important time difference (Fig. 2). This time difference presents23.5°. Then, according to the Earth tilt, longitude line passes from the two poles form 23.5° to the equinox Sunrise line. Subsequently, the last one must pass through the extremity East and West of polar circle at north and south hemisphere respectively. This situationnever observed. Therefore, if we suppose a perpendicular position of Earth to the Sun at the equinox, Sunrise time will be identicalthe same meridian. Since the Sunrise time at the equinox is identical for the countries located in the same meridian, 23.5° inclination of the Earth axis is rejected.

when
has a
a
is
on
Figure 2: Variation of Sunrise line if Earth has a 23.5° inclination axis

For insurance, the surveillance of shadow direction as seen in figure (3) shows its relationship with the Sun position as following:

• The Sun revolves around Earth (Earth is fixed); the object shadow direction shows a corresponding with the direction of solar
rays (Fig. 3, S1): this case is observed.

• If we check the heliocentric model (experienced in the laboratory), the object shadow direction formed a diverse angle with
the solar rays (Fig. 3, S2): this case is never observed.
The observations of shadow direction show that Sun revolves around Earth.

59
 Vol 4 Issue 8
 August, 2016
The International Journal Of Science & Technoledge (ISSN 2321 – 919X)
http://www.theijst.com

Figure 3: Variation of shadow direction

3.3. Critic of the Earth Characteristic in the Theoretical Orbit

First, in climatology, if the Earth is nearer to the Sun about 1° this causes its burn and if it moves away the Sun about 1° this causes glaciations of all the Earth. The imaginative orbit of the Earth around the Sun, along the year, is elliptic (different diameters) (Fig.This assumption means that the Earth revolves around Sun with different distances, but nothing is observed (not total burnglaciations during the year). This fact explains that the “imaginative” orbit does not exist and that Earth is fixed in the space without any motion.4).

or
Figure 4: Variation of the distance Earth/Sun in the elliptic orbit

Second, Earth has a volume, a weight and a revolution speeds (theoretical). In the motion dynamic, objects speeds are related to its weight. If the Earth has its different motions, the falling of the thousands of asteroids and meteors on the Earth every day must influence the motions velocities. These objects cause the decreasing of the speed and everything will be attached to the Earth surface, the duration of night/day will be longer. But nothing is observed and every day the numbers of meteors increase without any changes.

In addition, in the heliocentric model, seasons result from 23.5 ° inclination of the Earth rotation axis to its elliptic orbit around the Sun. But, the defect of this model is the position of winter and summer in the orbit. Winter appears when Earth is in perihelion (closer position to the Sun); the temperature decrease is attributed to the Earth speed which become faster (34.145km/s) than the average speed (29.829km/s). Summer appear when Earth is in aphelion; the temperature increase is attributed to the Earth speed which is slower (28.851km/s) than the average speed. Theoretically, this supposes the presence of self-power for the Earth to enhance or reduce its velocity. This suggestion has no argument to admit. Then, this conflict allows the suspicion of the heliocentric model validity.

Furthermore, if the earth revolves around the sun we must observe a clear parallax of the Sirius star, its size must be larger when the earth is closer. If we take the position of the earth in its orbit around the sun during the autumn equinox, after six months it will be in the opposite position (spring equinox) at a distance equal to 299 Million kilometers. Thus, an observer on Earth should observe places in the remote universe of 299 million km from its initial position. Subsequently, he must observe this star in larger dimensions and a different angle. Such situation never detected demonstrates the stability of the earth and refutes the heliocentrism theory.

The calculation of gravitational force between Sun /Moon and Earth/Moon shows that this interaction is more important between Sun/Moon. Since, Sun/Moon attraction (4,38082E+20 N.m2/kg2) is higher than Earth/Moon (1,98E+20 N.m2/kg2), the Moon cannot spin around the earth and we never observe its evolution steps. This situation interferes with the observation.

60
 Vol 4 Issue 8
 August, 2016
The International Journal Of Science & Technoledge (ISSN 2321 – 919X)
http://www.theijst.com

For more elucidate, the polar star is a stationary since it indicates the geographic north for peoples in Earth. The observations of skynight in different times (for example, an hourly basis) show the same position of this star without any motion contrasting withother stars. Such fact proves that Earth is steady.

Also, if the Earth spins around the Sun in 365 days, its velocity must be 108.000 Km/h, this value is 84 higher than the atmospheric sonic speed (1200 Km/h). Taking into account the atmosphere characteristics, a direct consequence of this velocity is to perceivehuge sound (sonic boom) caused by this motion. But these sound never heard only if supersonic plane across the sky. This situation could be interpreted by assuming that the atmospheric layer acts as an insulating body. This hypothesis cannot be admitting sincelisten to various types of sounds. As consequence, the inexistence of sonic boom testifies the stationarity of the earth.

3.4. The Objects Kinematic

First, if the Earth has an attraction force that is capable to hold and attach the atmosphere during its rotation around itself, the Sunthe other motions, we cannot detect the wind. Nevertheless, observations show the presence of various categories of wind fromair up to gale wind (the speed can overstep 50 knots). This fact confirms the absence of Earth attraction.

Second, coastal dynamics researchers show that direction and wave height are closely attached to the wind. If Earth spins aroundwith a speed of 1670 km / h we must find a single direction of the wave propagation which will be necessarily East (dominates direction and speed). But oceanographers have shown different wave propagation directions. The presence of a numerous directionswave’s propagation, when the Earth is rotating, assumes a higher carrying wind speed. This assumption is not convincingextravagant wind speed of 1670km / h (910 mile/h) destroys any sort of life on Earth rapidly. Regarding the Beaufort scale, the impact of a wind speed exceeding 70 mile/h on sea/ continental state causes catastrophic damage in the infrastructure and trees.comparison of speeds we cannot admit any motion for the earth.

Third, the presence of balancing rocks and stacking stones in lakes and rivers in numerous countries for several times is a powerful tool to reveal the earth stationarity. If the Earth rotated around itself, the Sun, the galaxy, the apex and for the universe expansions, these rocks would move in any direction. But, the immovability of these rocks for a long time shows the validity of the geocentric theory.

In the hydrology science, water is maintained stable in lakes / rivers if there are not any atmospheric perturbations. The observationenormous water bodies stable conflict with the Earth motions. This reality reveals that Earth is steady.

The kinematic of the space rockets collide with the earth supposed dynamic. If we assume that the Earth makes different motionsthe same time, it means it must travel far from the point of the rocket launch. Then, when the mission is accomplished it cannotthe position of the Earth which would be further away. In addition, the maximum speed of a rocket is 28000 km / h but the Earth’s speeds are much more important (108000 km/h, 220km/s). Since the speeds of the Earth are greater than the rockets one, theynever return to Earth. But, observations show that the rockets return quickly and easily to the Earth. Moreover, the satelliteslocated at a fixed distance from the Earth, if they move a meter we cannot pick up any signal (for example: satellite dish are placeda well determined direction, GPS). Then, the obtaining of these TV channels diversity and the positioning at any times interferethe Earth dynamics (revolves around itself (1670km/h), around the Sun (108000km / h), around the galaxy (220km/s) and forexpansion of the universe). Assuming the earth motions, these satellites must change their velocity permanently, to conservepositions to the Earth. But, satellites don’t have a self-power allowing them to enhance or reduce their speed. Such result, testifiesearth stability.

Moreover, if the Earth has it different speeds motions, we cannot obtain a high detection pictures from geostationary satellites orthe Moon. In fact, at such high speeds, the taken pictures must be blurry. The observation of diver’s high detected earth images conflict with these motions.

Finally, on any clear night, a shooting star can be seen in the sky about every ten minutes (for example the Perseids meteors observed between 11 August and 13 August 2014). It is commonly observed that many more meteors are seen in the early morning hours, between midnight and sunrise; then, they are seen in the evening between Sunset and midnight. If the Earth has different motions,cannot observe these meteors and cosmic rays every day bombarding the Earth’s surface. This situation could be explained byexistence of the Earth in the same position in the cosmos.

4. Conclusion

In conclusion, various physics arguments and astronomy observations show the stability of the Earth in the universe and the sun,moon, the stars and the planets motion around it. Then the heliocentric model must to be rejected. On the contrary, the revision ofgeocentric model will be necessary. Consequently, the Sun revolves around Earth daily in 23h 56min 4.1Second from East to West.

5. References

i. Popper Karl Raimund (2002), The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Psychology Press, 513 page
ii. Duhem Pierre Maurice Marie (1962), The Aim and Structure of Physical. Theory Book published by Princeton University
Press, 351pages.
iii. Davies (2003), The Newtonian Myth. Studies in History and Philosophy of Sciences, 34, 763–780
iv. Khiari (2011), Newton’s laws of motion revisited: some epistemological and didactic problems. Lat. Am. J. Phys. Educ.,5, No. 1,
v. Maxwell Nicholas (2014), Three Criticisms of Newton’s Inductive Argument in the Principia. Advances in Historical
Studies. Vol.3 , No.1, 2-11,

61
Vol 4 Issue 8
August,at

the
a
we
and
light
itself
of
since
By
of
at
find
can
are
in
with
the
its
the
from
we
the
the
the
Vol.
2016
The International Journal Of Science & Technoledge (ISSN 2321 – 919X)
http://www.theijst.com

vi.vii.viii.ix.x.xi.xii.xiii.xiv.xv.xvi.xvii.xviii.xix.xx.xxi.xxii.xxiii.xxiv.xxv.xxvi.xxvii.xxviii.xxix.xxx.xxxi.xxxii.xxxiii.xxxiv.xxxv.xxxvi.Escultura (2003), The flux theory of gravitation XVII. The new mathematics and physics. Applied MathematicsComputation 138 , - 127–149,
Scharma (2006), Einstein derived Erest = Mrest c2 from a NON-EXISTENT equation: A Discussion. The general Science
Journal
Afriat Alexender and Ermenegildo Caccese (2010), The relativity of inertia and reality of nothing. Studies in HistoryPhilosophy of Modern Physics 41, 9 –26,
Kochetkov (2013), Confirmation of results of the experiments of Michelson without the postulate about the invariance ofspeed of light. Millennium relativity, The general Science journal
Mathis (2013), The greatest standing errors in physics and mathematics. Book (http://milesmathis.com/index.html).
Chun-Xuan Jiang(2014), The discovery of primordial gravitational waves is 100% wrong. The general Science Journal
Lehmkurl Dennis (2014), Why Einstein did not believe that general relativity geometrizes gravity. Studies in HistoryPhilosophy of Modern physics, Vol 46, Part B, Pages 316–326, (2014).
Jayant V. Narlicar (1999), Seven Wonders of the Cosmos. Cambridge University Press, 15 avr , 324 pages.
Michelson Albert and Edward Morley (1887), On the relative motion of the earth and the aluminiferous ether. American
journal of science, Volume XXXIV, No 203 (1887),
Tesla Nicolas (1905), Art of transmitting electrical energy through the natural medium. United States Patent Office, Serial
No. 113,034,
Lammertink Arend (2013), Electrical Engineer disproves Einsteins Relativity Theory: The Ruins of 106 Years Relativity.
Tuks Unsorted KieknWat TWordt Stuff
Bahjat R. J. Muhyedeen (2009), New Concept of Mass-Energy Equivalence. European Journal of Scientific Research,
Vol.26No.2, pp.161-175,
Bahjat R. J. Muhyedeen (2013), Nuclear Magneton Theory of Mass Quantization "Unified Field Theory". European Journal
of Scientific Research, Vol. 100, No 1, pp.66-140,
Carlip S (2000), Aberration and the speed of gravity. Physics Letters A, 267, 81–87,
Galperin (2008), Information transmittal and time uncertainty, measuring the speed of light and time of reflection,
representations of Newton’s second law and related problems. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 56, 1271–
1290,
Pedram and Jalalzadeh (2008), Quantum cosmology with varying speed of light: Canonical approach. Physics Letters B,1–6,
Brax (2012), Lorentz invariance violation in modified gravity. Physics Letters B, 712, 155–160,
Pfeifer and Wohlfarth (2012), Beyond the speed of light on Finsler spacetimes. Physics Letters B, 712, 284–288,
Bouchard (2012), Finite Theory of the Universe, Dark Matter Disproof and Faster-Than-Light Speed. Physics Procedia,222-241,
Katz U.F. and Spiering Ch. 704 (2012), High-energy neutrino astrophysics: Status and perspectives. Progress in ParticleNuclear Physics, 67, 651-,
Bertolucci Sergio (2013), Neutrino speed: a report on the speed measurements of the BOREXINO, ICARUS andexperiments with the CNGS beam. Nuclear Physics B (Proc. Suppl.), 235–236, 289–295,
Chun-Xuan Jiang (2014), An equation that changed the universe: F =- mc2/R. The general Science Journal,
Ishihara Aya (2013), Ultra-high energy neutrinos with IceCube. Nuclear Physics B (Proc. Suppl.), 235–236, 352–357,
Zhou Lingli and Bo-Qiang Ma (2013), Neutrino speed anomaly as signal of Lorentz violation. Astroparticle Physics, 44,27,
Hernandez-Rey Juan José (2013), High energy neutrino telescopes in the Northern Hemisphere. Nuclear InstrumentsMethods in Physics Research A, 725, 7 –12,
Zhehui Wang, Christopher L. Morris (2013), Tracking fast neutrons. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research
A, 726, 145 –15 4,
Abe et al (2014), Observation of Electron Neutrino Appearance in a Muon Neutrino Beam. Physical review letters, PRL061802,
Foley James A (2014), Mass of Neutrinos Accurately Calculated for First Time, Physicists Report. Nature World News.
(available in www.natureworldnews.com/articles/ 5968/ 20140210/mass-neutrinos-accurately-calculated-first-time-
physicists-report.htm)
Shigeru Yoshida (2014), Ultra-high-energy cosmic neutrinos: at 1015eV energies and above. Comptes Rendus Physique,
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages 309–317,
Paul R. Weissman (2007), Encyclopedia of the Solar System, Second Edition , Chapter 1 - The Solar System and Its Placethe Galaxy, Pages 1-28.
Véronique Dehant, Tim Van Hoolst (2014), Encyclopedia of the Solar System, Third Edition, Chapter 8 - RotationPlanets, Pages 159-184.

62
Vol 4 Issue 8
August,and
and
the
and
660,
38,
and
LVD
24–
and
112,
in
of
2016
[*/quote*]


 99 
 on: April 13, 2017, 10:34:39 PM 
Started by worelia - Last post by worelia
Gulf News is not a reliable source. Gulf News cheats surfers. Gulf News freezes browsers. Gulf News must stop their criminal "attitudes".

This case of science fraud is much too important to keep it secret. Why? Because it is not the first one and it will not be the last one. Because it is based on religion.

For the free internet, this is what professor Nidhal Guessoum wrote:

[*quote*]
Gulf News

PhD thesis: The earth is flat
in agreement61%

The Arab world will continue to suffer educational and cultural crises until it properly digests the different methodologies of science and religion
By Nidhal Guessoum, Special to Gulf News
19:36 April 10, 2017

Last week, a huge scandal rocked the Tunisian and Arab scientific and educational world: a PhD student submitted a thesis declaring Earth to be flat, unmoving, young (only 13,500 years of age), and the centre of the universe.

Going even bolder and further, the student explicitly rejected the physics of Newton and Einstein, the astronomy of Copernicus and Kepler, the cosmology of the Big Bang, the main models of atmospheric and geological activity, and most of modern climatology.

The student submitted her thesis after five years of work; it was then sent to two assessors, thus passing the first stage of approvals. The reports were expected soon, for the thesis defence to be scheduled.

It was at this stage that fate luckily intervened: a copy of the thesis was “leaked” to the former president of the Tunisian Astronomical Association, who checked that it was not a hoax and then quickly rang the alarm by posting on Facebook the general conclusions of the thesis, verbatim.

Gulf News readers may recall that two years ago, I wrote a column lamenting the talk that a Saudi cleric had given in the UAE insisting that Earth does not rotate, neither around itself nor around the Sun; I described the moment as a “debacle” and tried to draw lessons from it.

This new scandal is much worse, because it does not come from a cleric (that was bad enough) but rather from a PhD student in science, her supervisor held the Professor rank (the highest in academia), and they were explicitly rejecting major parts of modern science.

They also went further than just submit a thesis, they published a paper (in an obscure and disreputable journal) presenting “physical and astronomical arguments” for geo-centrism (Earth being central and fixed in the universe).

The paper is available online, and anyone can quickly check that both the paper and the journal are worthless: countless grammatical errors, mediocre references, puny scientific arguments; the journal is classified as “fake and predatory”, one of those “pay and we’ll publish your article quickly, with no reviewing or editing”...

I don’t mean to belabour the point, but it is worth citing a few ideas from the general conclusion given at the end of the thesis, if at least to fully impress upon the reader the size of the calamity that has just occurred — before we analyse its causes.

The “results” of this doctoral thesis include: the Earth is flat and young, and it stands immobile at the centre of the universe, which is made of only one galaxy; the sun’s diameter is 1,135km (not 1.4 million km), the moon is 908 km wide, and they lie 687 and 23 times closer to Earth, respectively; there are 11 planets; stars are “limited” in number and have a diameter of 292 km (not millions of km).

How does one explain such stunning ignorance of basic astronomy, coupled with such brashness and insolence — rejecting Copernicus, Kepler, Newton, Einstein, Hubble, and everything in science?

In this particular case, I believe this was due to an adherence to religious, scriptural literalism, in other words taking the meanings of religious texts literally and blindly, at the cost of rejecting all knowledge that appears to contradict it, no matter how much evidence supports it.

Indeed, we find in the conclusions of the thesis clear indications of this stand and approach, expressions such as: “using physical and religious arguments”, “also proving the world scale of [Noah’s] flood”, “proposed a new kinematic approach that conforms to the verses of the Quran”, “the roles of the stars are: (1) to be ornaments of the sky; (2) to stone the devils; and (3) as signs to guide creatures in the darkness of earth”; and finally “the geo-centric model... accords with the verses of the Quran and the pronouncements of our Prophet.”

Comeback

Flat-Earthism has lately been making a comeback and spreading like bush fire through social media.

Search for “flat earth” on YouTube and you’ll find almost a million videos; “flat earth society” gets 400,000 pages on the web; “flat earth proof” gets you 200,000 pages; etc.

But this social media trend I attribute to people’s inclination toward conspiracy theories: “Nasa has faked the moon-landing”; “Nasa photoshops space images”; “Give us real proofs that these interplanetary spacecraft are factual”; etc.

In 2001, when the internet was still young, and the “moon-landing hoax” was just emerging as a trending meme (without social media to support its spread), I gave several talks titled “Did Nasa fake the moon landing... or are we miserably failing to educate the public?”

But the latest shocking event (the PhD thesis) implies that we are not only failing to educate the public (that is manifest in the trendy “flat earth” and “Nasa lies” memes on social media) but also our brightest students.

It has been reported that the PhD student had previously graduated at the top of her class.

What we are failing to clarify and communicate is how to distinguish between scientific knowledge (facts, models, theories, etc.) and religious knowledge (what verses mean and what they intend to teach us).

I believe the Arab-Muslim world will continue to suffer educational and cultural crises, not to mention a total lack of understanding of science, until it properly digests the different methodologies of science and religion, without diminishing the value of each.

 

Nidhal Guessoum is a professor of physics and astronomy at the American University of Sharjah. You can follow him on Twitter at: www.twitter.com/@NidhalGuessoum.
[*/quote*]

 100 
 on: April 13, 2017, 10:07:11 PM 
Started by Rholeander - Last post by Julian
Für das seltsame Testgebiet "NeuroSpot" gibt es eine eigene Domain. Dort wird man fündig:

https://neurospot.de/therapiemoeglichkeiten/

[*quote*]
NeuroSpot
Therapiemöglichkeiten
Therapiemöglichkeiten NeuroSpot

Niedergeschlagenheit ,schlechte Laune und Antriebslosigkeit sind häufige Symptome bei Stress-Patienten. Viele Betroffene werden klassisch medikamentös behandelt. Andere möchten dies nicht. Die NeuroSpot Tests bieten über die herkömmliche medikamentöse Behandlung auch andere Optionen an.

Die NeuroSpot Tests setzen zusätzlich auf naturheilkundliche Präparate und beziehen die Ernährung mit ein.

Mit dem Verzehr der passenden, auf die Botenstoffe positiv einwirkenden Nahrungsmittel wie bestimmte Fleischsorten und Gemüse, ist es möglich, die Wiederherstellung des Gleichgewichts zu beeinflussen.

Sie haben Fragen zu den NeuroSpot Produkten oder möchten Informationsmaterial ? Hier geht’s zum Kontaktformular!

    Informationen anfordern
    Sie haben Fragen zu den NeuroSpot Produkten oder möchten Informationsmaterial ?
     Hier geht’s zum Kontaktformular!
    Kontakt
    CTL & Ortholabor GmbH
    Anemonenweg 3a
    26160 Bad Zwischenahn
    T 06151 66680-00
    F 06151 66680-01
    service@ctl-labor-de

Copyright 2014 - CTL & Ortholabor GmbH. All Rights Reserved |Impressum|Datenschutzerklärung|Rechtliche Hinweise

Diese Website benutzt Cookies. Wenn sie die Website weiter nutzen, gehen wir von ihrem Einverständnis aus.OKMehr erfahren
[*/quote*]


Auf der einen Seite die "Tests" und auf der anderen die "Therapien".  Fleisch und Gemüse? Wenn da nicht die bösen Allergien und Unverträglichkeiten wären"! Schon dreht die Spirale weiter zu den anderen Tests von Allergien und Unverträglichkeiten. Ein einträgliches Karussel.


Gegen Niedergeschlagenheit gibt es ein tatsächlich wirkendes Mittel. Das ist völlig natürlich und unglaublich preiswert. Zum Leidwesen der Heiler-Mafia kann man es im Supermarkt kaufen. Es heißt Kakao und enthält die Wirksubstanz Theobromin.

Selbstverständlich essen echte Experten den Kakao ohne das von der Suchtmittel-Mafia verwendeten Suchtgift Zucker. Kakao-Pulver pur, wie bei den Inkas. Nur für harte Männer. 8)

Diesen Rat gibt es vom TG-1 kostenlos. Ohne Heiler-Diplom, ohne Termine, ohne Wartezeit, ohne Heiligenschein. Einfach so.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10]